Right now I am deciding between the Canon S5 IS or spending the extra hundreds of dollars and going for a Canon XT or XTi.
What should I go with if I don't have any experience with photography but don't want to end up with a purchase I will be disappointed in.
If you guys say go the the higher end camera. Is the price difference worth going from an XT to an XTi.
Also with either of the DSLRs, should I just get it with the starter lens included or should I buy the body by itself and a separate lens? I would like to respectable amount of zoom.
I'm trying not to spend above $700 but if theres anything slightly above that I'll consider that if its worth it.
Thanks for your time and effort.
Better yet, black or silver. ha.
Just my two cents though :)
if you want to be creative with your photography and pursue it as a hobby or career then go with an slr.
i own the xt and honestly i wouldnt spend the extra $ for the xti just yet.
Mainly for the trip but I keep running into situations where I want to take a picture of something so I've been thinking of turning it into a hobby. I'm even looking into taking some classes at my college.
So what about the lens situation? Do you have the "starter" lens or something else.
http://www.adorama.com/ICADRXTIBK.html?searchinfo=canon%20xti&item_no=11
sorry once again I don't know much about the different types of lenses but can the stock lens zoom and if so how far?
the starter lens will work just fine until you feel the need to upgrade.
the kit lens does zoom. it won't get in tight on the architectural details of a building, you would need a long zoom for that. you could rent (there are websites to rent from) a long zoom if that seems like a necessary accessory for the trip.
i shot with the kit lens for almost a year until my photography skills got to the point of where i needed an equipment upgrade.
And yes, wide angle zoom and telephoto zoom would probably fulfill your needs.
Money has become an issue and I was wondering if there were any other choices. I want a camera that can give me a crystal clear image. I want my pictures to be as detailed as possible so that when I look at the picture, I can feel like I am there.
Is there a camera that is cheaper than the xt/xti that can do this even if it is a point and shoot?
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU
along with a cheap telephoto for around $200.
Is this good advice?
Also as to the XSi, is it worth raising the extra money to get it instead?
It is small and much lighter, it has a ton of cool features it takes immaculate shots the only thing you will have an issue with is shallow depth of field if your subject isn't right on top of you.. (As far as a beginners needs)
I would say if you want something you can put in a small camera bag and forget about until you need it go with the S5 (I am assuming it is the same size as the S3).
Also I am assuming the S5 takes AA batteries although I did read it consumes batteries much faster than the S3, but the XT takes a lithium type battery that doesn't last very long.
JMO
Just read your update try and get your hands on an S3 I have read reviews on the S5 I think the S3 is better for a few reasons.
Right now I am deciding between the Canon S5 IS or spending the extra hundreds of dollars and going for a Canon XT or XTi.
What should I go with if I don't have any experience with photography but don't want to end up with a purchase I will be disappointed in.
If you guys say go the the higher end camera. Is the price difference worth going from an XT to an XTi.
Also with either of the DSLRs, should I just get it with the starter lens included or should I buy the body by itself and a separate lens? I would like to respectable amount of zoom.
I'm trying not to spend above $700 but if theres anything slightly above that I'll consider that if its worth it.
Thanks for your time and effort.
if you want to use the camera only for this trip or just to do some snapshots then go with a good point and shoot.
if you want to be creative with your photography and pursue it as a hobby or career then go with an slr.
i own the xt and honestly i wouldnt spend the extra $ for the xti just yet.
And yes, you should buy the 50mm 1.8 also.
Better yet, black or silver. ha.
good things are said about both companies.
black is supposed the color of the pros but i have the silver :) so i guess i'm not a pro :(
And to sandspur, thank you, its nice to hear a different option but at the same time after reading what sarah said and what other people have said on other forums, I don't want to spend the initial money on the S5 to only feel limited later and go ahead and buy the DSLR while I could just get the DSLR now and be content.
I will most likely end up going with the XTi with the lens kit. I think I can find it right under $600 with adorama. Any other suggested places I can buy?
My opinion is to stick to Adorama or B&H... just to be sure you`ll not be scammed... :)
Good luck with your future new camera, and have a nice trip :)
I can probably already say I'm going to be taking pictures of monuments(buildings) and people. For people I shouldn't need zoom but for certain buildings, I won't physically be able to get closer.
What about the XSi? Those that seem worth purchasing over the XTi? yes or no and why?
http://www.adorama.com/ICADRXTIBK.html?searchinfo=canon%20xti&item_no=11
sorry once again I don't know much about the different types of lenses but can the stock lens zoom and if so how far?
click here (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?shs=xti&ci=0&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t)
Get the S5is. Three reasons (well, actually four)
1. It'll cost a lot less that $700
2. The quality of construction and materials in the S5 is FAR superior to either the XT or XTi. The S5 is built on a magnesium frame, and it's joints, fittings and seals are outstanding compared to any of the low end (plastic) DSLR bodies (no matter who makes them).
3. The quality of the lens built in to the S5 is FAR superior (I mean better glass ... Really better glass!) than any kit lens you'll get with a Rebel. PLUS! A great 12x Zoom Range ... which no kit lens can come close to. (Of course, you could opt for higher quality lenses - Either Canon or Tamron, Sigma, etc.- but not on the budget you've mentioned.
4. The S5 is smaller, more compact, easier to carry around - whether you're traveling in Europe or back home and just snap shooting.
Actually, there's one other advantage to the lower price thing: Since the S5is has a hot shoe you could still stay below $700 and add a SB600 flash, or maybe the new SB400.
I'm making these recommendations because I own the S5's predecessor (the S3is) and it's my constant companion. I don't use it for my pro work - but I could in a pinch and get outstanding results.
So the question is now. Are their any major differences between the XT and XTi in terms of photo quality?
Im asking this because I can get an XT package for $531 while an XTi and lens kit will cost me $590.
Is it worth spending the extra for an XTi?
And make sure you practice! You want to know how to use the camera before you go. And the more familiar you are with your camera, the more easily you'll be able to adjust your camera to get the photos you want.
I'm using the 350D (XT) and it's quite capable. Just remember that having a more expensive camera isn't the most important part of being able to get good pics. it's knowing how to use it. if you get the kit lens, it will be a wide angle zoom lens which will get the job done. it's not the best lens, but it will give decent photos nonetheless. i used mine for over a year before upgrading it.
---------- Quoted from Megapixel.net -----------
The XTi's auto focus system, for example, is different from the XT, and is imported from the EOS 30D. This is an auto focus system with 9 AF areas, and is a valuable addition to an entry-level SLR, since this is a system that is fast and precise.
The buffer memory of the XTi is also improved over the XT, and the XTi is capable of longer bursts, double that of the XT, be it with RAW or JPEG images.
The Canon Digital Rebel XTi, although it resembles the XT, is in fact a distinct model. Its 10-megapixel CMOS sensor gives it a slight advantage in terms of resolution, but it is really the AF, the buffer memory, the Picture Styles, and the dust reduction system that position it ahead of the XT. Although the lens it is currently sold with in kit form does not do the camera justice, quite unlike when it is paired with any of Canon finer lenses.
------------------------------------------------------ End Quote
umm, is the lens kit that comes with the XTi a wide angle zoom?
Canon Rebel XTi
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 - standard kit
Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 - nice for those buildings and other things you won't be able to get close to. you can also look at the Sigma equivalent, which is cheaper and good.
And get it in black:D
So what about the lens situation? Do you have the "starter" lens or something else.
i think either one comes with the kit lens which is 18-55mm. this lens will not knock your socks off but it isnt horrible.
i personally use the L series lenses. if you arent familiar with those they are canon's pro line of lenses. very expensive.
a lens that i own which isnt an L is the 50mm f1.8. it can be had for around $85. very sharp lens. big upgrade from the kit lens. bad thing......it isnt a zoom. it's a fixed focal length....your feet become your zoom.
sigma makes some good quality lenses for prolly less than what canon charges for theirs.
you have to ask yourself what subjects are you going to be photographing. that will help decide which lens or lenses you will need.
Not extremely wide, but wide enough for just about anything you'll want. Go to the shop and have a look through it beforeyou buy.
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |