Should facebook have the right to veto advertisements about Clinical Hypnotherapy?

  • by
  • on 01.08.09
  • creampiesca.com
  • edit
  • Facebook is potentially a valuable advertising channel for therapists, however in an arbitrary decision that hypnotherapy has no value, they prevent hypnotherapists from advertising their services. This despite the fact there are many research documents proving the value of hypnotherapy. Do you believe this is a fair decision from an informed publisher?


  • I do believe they it is a fair decision, holistic therapies may work for some people but the government will not waste their time to have these treatments approved. Personally I think holistic treatment is a joke, along with chiropractics-another joke.


  • Well Facebook's oweners OWN the site. They can display whatever they want. its their right.

    Your meaning the same thing as if someone were to want you to jump off a building and you didnt want to. Suicide causes a faster death but you dont want to die faster. so is what your saying a fair choice? didnt think so


  • It is their site - they are free to veto anything they want. Fair enough. They don't have to accept advertising from anyone.







    • #If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.#
    Your name:
    E-mail:
    Telphone:

    Your comments:


    If you have any other info about Should facebook have the right to veto advertisements about Clinical Hypnotherapy? , Please add it free.