I own a small recording studio business. Actually, I've just started a
small recording studio business. Most often musicians come to me to
make audition CDs which will never be sold commercially.
A singer has just signed with me with the intention of creating a
commercial CD. Much of what she'll sing should be in the public domain
(is Brahms in the public domain?). But some music certainly is not
(Send in the Clowns etc.). I need help researching what
responsibilities I have as a recording studio to gain permission to
include ed music on a commercial CD.
If you could provide some insight and some URLs that take me to where
this information might be found I would appreciate it.
Thank You
Hi beauregard:
I have found a wealth of information about what needs to be done in
order to obtain permission for covers of songs recorded on a
CD. However, I need one small clarification from you before I can
answer this question:
* Are you - the recording studio - going to actually be the one
arranging for the duplication and sale of this CD (or any other such
CDs in the future), or is the artist(s) going to be doing that? If the
artist is self-producing, then I don't think you, as the studio, have
much - if any - responsibilities.
Everything I've found leads me to believe that the responsibilities in
these cases fall on the one actually selling the finished product. In
fact, if you are *not* selling the finished product, I also have an
example of waiver-like wording that you could require your artist to
comply to before you undergo the recording - just to cover your
you-know-what. ;-)
Please let me know what the situation is.
Thanks.
websearcher
Dear web (may I call you web?),
As much as I'd like to dump this whole thing into the artist's lap, I
don't think that will be possible. I think that the artist has enough
on his/her plate that these tasks should fall to the studio. But I do
see the differentiation you point out. So let's go with *me*, the
studio, arranging for the duplicating and sales of the CD.
Thank You
Hi beauregard:
Certainly, you can call me "web" if you want. :-)
It is honorable of you not to want to dump this issue into
the artist's lap. And smart - as your recording business grows (which
I certainly hope it does) you are very likely to have to learn how to
handle these things eventually.
Let me share with you some of what I've found so far. Then, once
you've read through that, you can tell me whether you need any further
clarification and we can proceed from there. I believe that for
questions such as this, a back-and-forth method works best.
By far the following is the best webpage I found about licensing for
cover songs recorded on a commercial CD. It is anecdotal, clear, and
covers several of the possible pitfalls/issues that are likely to
arise for the majority of first-timers.
The Cover Song Quagmire: Three Ways to Obtain Mechanical Licenses for
Legally Recording/Distributing Cover Versions (by Dale Turner)
URL: http://www.vocalist.org.uk/recording_cover_songs.html
Please read through that webpage and go to some of the links it recommends.
After reading that, it will become apparent that what you need for
this particular artist is Mechanical Licenses for the songs she wishes
to cover. The following document lists out some valuable information
of Mechanical Licenses:
The Independent Artists Recording Guide
URL: http://www.summitsound.com/ftp/RecordingGuide.pdf
Note: Go to pages 19-20, "Securing Mechanical Licenses".
*If* you run into interference with authorities who seemingly want to
deny you license to cover certain songs, the following page gives
details about "compulsory licenses":
Must you get permission to record someone else's song?
URL: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_324b.html
Quote: "However, in the rare event that negotiations fail, the
laws contain provisions for a type of mechanical license
called a 'compulsory license,' which, in effect, give anyone the right
to record any song he or she wants to, as long as notice is given to
the song's owners within 30 days after the recording is made
and before it is distributed. Compulsory licenses were written into
the laws in 1909 in an attempt to break up a monopoly in the
piano-roll industry--an industry which has since been pretty well
broken up, period. So why negotiate at all? Mainly because the law
dictates higher royalty rates and stricter payment schedules for
compulsory licenses than you can obtain with the negotiated kind."
What is and what isn't in the "public domain" is a trickier issue. The
rules and regulations for this change from country to country
depending on where it was ed and where you are publishing.
The simple rule of thumb for publishing in the U.S. is that if the
song was written in 1922 or earlier, it is public domain and no
licensing is required.
An excellent web resource for determining public domain material is:
Public Domain Music
URL: http://www.pdinfo.com/
Quote: "A reference site to help identify public domain songs and
public domain music . . . royalty free music you can use anywhere and
any way you choose . . . performance, sing-along, film, video,
advertising, business, or personal."
Go to the Public Domain Song List at:
Public Domain Music List with Original Dates
URL: http://www.pdinfo.com/list.htm
and click on the letter "B" for Brahms:
B
URL: http://www.pdinfo.com/list/b.htm
If you scroll down, you'll see that all works of Brahms are indeed in
the public domain. However, the disclaimer at the top of the page
needs to be heeded:
"This list is intended only as a help in researching public domain
materials. Inclusion on this list is NOT sufficient documentation
that music is in the public domain. Even if a song is PD, there may
be arrangements of the song still under . You MUST work from
a published copy of the item with a date old enough to
qualify the item for public domain status."
If you go to the page for "S" and scroll down, you'll see that "Send
in the Clowns" is not listed - as was to be expected.
Despite the fact that you want to take care of the licensing for the
covers your artist is going to include on her CD, it would still be
wise to look out for the interests and (legal) safety of your studio
as well. The following links might give you some ideas on this front:
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DEAL POINTS IN A RECORDING STUDIO AGREEMENT?
URL: http://law.freeadvice.com/intellectual_property/music_law/recording_studio_agreement.htm
Quote: "If a recording studio agreement is being considered, there are
certain key issues that should be addressed and clarified."
Note: This is written from the artist's point of view, but the
insights are useful for the studio too.
Before You Order
URL: http://www.mmsdirect.com/cass_b4.php
Note: Read section 2, "Look after & licensing issues", for
some valuable insights on what to require of any artist re .
Search Strategy (on Google):
* "recording covers" music
* music laws
* "mechanical licensing"
* "mechanical licensing" cover
* "mechanical license" cover responsibility studio artist
* "mechanical license" cover "recording studio"
* " law" "recording studio"
* "recording studio" laws
* "compulsory licenses" music
* music "public domain"
I hope this helps! Please, ask for clarification if you need any.
websearcher (a.k.a. web)
If you want me to open another question I will, but I'll pose the
question here, nonetheless. "Is there a minumum number of copies of a
CD below which no license is required? Often I record audition CDs for
musicians and make one or on rare occasions, two copies. These CDs are
never sold and are not distributed except to those who are judging the
musician."
Hi beauregard:
Sorry for the delay on this. I've provided an answer to your question at:
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=516091
websearcher
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.#
Author
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Vestibulum at arcu. Integer et risus. Morbi id tellus. Integer felis. Mauris malesuada, turpis vitae facilisis euismod, dui arcu adipiscing sem, eu vulputate leo ante in lacus. Sed porta accumsan lectus. Aenean ac sem.